Philosophy Now 2023. Its full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. Bad actions will bring about misery. human nature is shaped by socioeconomic conditions and more focus on humans as both individual and collective creatures. Donec aliquet. Dont all monotheistic religionsat least the so-called Abrahamic onesshare the same basic anthropology?, Those are understandable questions, but I want to challenge their premise by briefly noting some important differences between Christianity, Islam, and Judaism. Fourth, we are social creaturesdesigned by God for community: Then the Lord God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him a helper fit for him. (Genesis 2:18), Thus we see the creation of the woman as a fitting companion for the man, and thereafter the institution of marriage and the family. Alternatively, if we discover that Buddhists can hold the two claims simultaneously without contradiction, this in itself neither shows that the no-self doctrine is actually true, nor that the lay person would be compelled to accept that the self is an illusion. Nevertheless, the fact remains that Islam lacks a doctrine of the imago Dei and therefore humans simply cannot bear the kind of significance they enjoy in a biblical worldview. We are physical, material beings. Nagasena viewed human as combination of various elements like body, consciousness, perception, thought, and sensation which are known as Skandhas (Ramanan, 2017). How do we respond when challenged by fear? We have to create and distinguish true and false thoughts about the world around us, to be able to think about things - combinations of things. Donec aliquet. "And how is nibbana to be shown? be any way troubled, molested or discountenanced for or in respect of his or her Elman, Nietzsche and Buddhism; Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol.44, 1983, p.683). PCN 107 Assessment of Your View of Human Nature. A common view among Naturalists is that all of the sciences can be reduced to physics: biology can be explained in terms of chemistry, which in turn can be explained in terms of physical entities and properties. Nirvana is literally translated from the Sanskrit as extinction/snuffed out. The text mentions that Nagasena learned the Tripiaka under the Greek Buddhist monk Dhammarakkhita near Ptaliputta (modern Patna). Would the logical incompatibility of the two doctrines of no-self and self-liberation necessarily have to result in the falsehood of at least one of the doctrines? They are sterile soilsnothing good can grow in them. Alvin Plantinga, On Christian Scholarship, in. Yet through empirical investigation, Buddhists conclude that there is no such thing. Milinda is different now from when he is a baby. In the remainder of this essay, then, I propose to consider three prominent worldviews and the competing views of human nature that they embody and entail. thereunto belonging professing to believe in Jesus Christ, shall from henceforth ", "Very good, Nagasena, you have taught about nibbana, you have explained about the realisation of nibbana, you have praised the qualities of virtue, shown the right way of practice, raised aloft the banner of the Dhamma, established the Dhamma as a leading principle, not barren nor without fruit are the efforts of those with right aims!". The thing cannot be said to be identical with one of its parts, nor the parts collectively, nor with something different from the parts. Home > Social Science homework help > Philosophy homework help. They are also found, however, in much cruder forms across the cultural landscape today. Given the divergent interpretations of the Buddhas meaning of unborn here, we cannot assume that the Buddha intended to posit an eternal entity which is unborn in the first sense. Moreover, there is no objective reality in the following sense: there is no reality that exists independently of us, that is to say, independently of our thoughts and our language. For the Postmodernist, truth is a social construction. Seeing nothing there to be taken hold of, as on a red-hot iron ball, his mind overflows with discontent and a fever takes hold of his body; hopeless and without a refuge he becomes disgusted with repeated lives. In sum, the specialists scrutinize each item and give an estimate of how much it might fetch at auction. ), Fifth, we are not merely physical creatures. Fusce dui lectus, congue vipiscing elit. trans-historical view of human nature, I also aim to show that human nature is a necessary condition for demonstrating that alienation does occur in capitalist society, and presumably any other society that sup presses the better parts of species-being. Nam risus ante, dapibus a molestie consequat, ultrices ac magna. Value and worth will be entirely in the eye of the beholder. ', "Therewith his mind leaps forward into the state where there is no becoming. During this interrogation Milindas view of the self as a convenient designator or conceptual fiction is transformed from the idea of it being a mere empty sound into his understanding that the term chariot or Nagasena or any other composite entity is but a way of counting, term, appellation, convenient designation, mere name He acknowledges that the belief is conventionally true, but of persons in the absolute sense there is no ego to be found (Radhakrishnan & Moore, A Sourcebook in Indian Philosophy, p.284). This leads us again to ask: how can the concept of liberation remain coherent unless we can identify one who is liberated? But the word person becomes merely a convenient designator for the fiction we accept when we believe that a person is something over and above these component parts. The redeemed are not merely renewed to the image of God but conformed specifically to the image of Christ, the God-man. Its all just physical stuff. But before launching into that discussion, I should say a brief word about worldviews in general. I would have to say that the chariot is an appropriate simile to the human self. Nam lacinia pulvinar tortor ntriia pulvinar tortor nec facilisis. The following is adapted from the first of two lecturesthe Fifth Annual B. and Why It Still Matters. According to this legend, the Emerald Buddha would have been created in India in 43 BC by Nagasena in the city of Ptaliputta. Consider how the inspired Psalmists anthropological reflections begin and end with the glory of Goda thoroughly theocentric visionwhile encompassing a view of man that is neither demoralizingly low nor blasphemously high. "Like a mountain peak, it is very high, immoveable, inaccessible to the defilements, it has no place where defilements can grow, and it is without favouritism or prejudice. What is the nature of the self that Buddhists deny, and how can they justify this claim? Theories about the nature of humankind form a part of every culture. nagasena view on human nature7ds grand cross banner schedule7ds grand cross banner schedule If we value ourselves highly, then we are highly valuable; if we dont value ourselves highly, then we arent highly valuable. Christian Theisms view of ultimate reality. Nature is ultimately non-moral, non-rational, and non-personal. Frankly, it doesnt matter, except to say this: we do not find our origins in the creative act of an absolute personal God. (ii) A central cause of suffering, according to Buddhism, is psychological attachment to the self. And even if Buddha is asserting the existence of some unoriginated entity, why should we designate this entity as the self? What would result from the discovery of either the compatibility or the incompatibility of the two doctrines? There are two other major problems with experience here: (i) If experience is suffering, how could the experience of enlightenment result in liberation? Arts & Humanities Philosophy. The self is not a mortal being (breathing, eating, drinking, sleeping) nor is it part of the body, nor the parts together, nor apart form his parts. For instance, our ability to analyse the arguments for no-self, and our acknowledging that the skandhas are in a constant state of arising and dissolving, presupposes that there is a self which has the capacity to analyse and to observe change. Pellentesque dapibus efficitur laoreet. If there is any categorical distinction among creatures in the Quran, it isnt between humans and animals but between believers and unbelievers.[20]. A living being may be reborn into any one of six planes: positive karma leads towards three fortunate realms (gods, demigods, men) and negative karma leads towards three unfortunate realms (animals, ghosts and hell). Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. The sinfulness of that estate whereinto man fell consists in the guilt of Adams first sin, the want of original righteousness, and the corruption of his whole nature, which is commonly called original sin; together with all actual transgressions which proceed from it. He answered the king using example of his chariots to show that there is If one cannot distinguish between one dharma and another, yet at a particular point in the stream of consciousness the dharma changes from one body to another, from one plane to another, surely at that point there is a level of discontinuity, it is not entirely continuous and indistinguishable. Roughly stated, a worldview is an overall philosophical outlook on the world: an all-encompassing perspective on everything that exists and matters to us. With this (again bare-bones) outline of the Postmodernist worldview, let us now focus on the consequences for anthropology. On this view, we should note, any human may be treated as a means to an end, namely, the happiness of other humans. What are Anthony Giddens views on the state ? 7 Q Who states that the state 'is a capitalist tool and must be destroyed by revolution'? 3-6, 19, and 83-86. We have looked at two arguments advancing the no-self doctrine, which draw on the idea of a self as permanent or controlling respectively. His answer: We decompose.. However, as we shall see, one difficulty with this stance is that it seems to require those who hold it to abandon the demands of reason for a position which is defended without recourse to the usual methods of philosophical enquiry. However, this leads to the question . Human were created by God; more precisely, human were specially created by God. There is no God in the classical sense. When the angel Iblis (Satan) refuses to do so, God asks him why, and the reply comes forth, Because Im better than him: you created me out of fire and him out of dirt![19] Such protests notwithstanding, the idea that the angels should bow down to a human, rather than the reverse, hardly suggests a low view of mankind. We consist of both body and soul. (The immediate problem with this answer should be obvious to anyone with a high-school level knowledge of twentieth-century history.) Man A steals Man B's mangoes. Nagasena states that 'Nagasena' is a mere name, there is no fixed identity to be grasped. Postmodernists typically view knowledge along one of the following lines: Postmodernisms view of goodness and value. All things are in constant flux. I shall in fact offer two answers to the title question; which one we accept will depend on our attitude towards the claims of logic. Only science, however, can really deliver that truth. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Identify and explain: Denis Kearney, Chinese Exclusion Act, Immigration Restriction League, Grover Cleveland. I refer here to Orthodox Judaism, by which I mean that traditional branch of historical Judaism which continues to affirm biblical monotheism and the authority of the Old Testament scriptures. Nagasena greeted the King by acknowledging that Nagasena was his name, but that "Nagasena" was only a designation; no permanent individual "Nagasena" could be found. What Judaism lacks, compared with Christianity, is a doctrine of redemption through divine incarnation and atonement. Karma is involved in the cycle of rebirth. Access to over 100 million course-specific study resources, 24/7 help from Expert Tutors on 140+ subjects, Full access to over 1 million Textbook Solutions, EXPLAIN NAGASENA VIEW ON HUMAN NATURE? I suggest however that we ought to say something deeper and more consistently theocentric. This biography of an Indian religious figure is a stub. I am convinced that there can be no resolution of these issues while people hold such radically divergent views of human nature, situated in such diametrically opposed worldviews. What is the Christian Theist view of human nature? Its a pseudo-question, because its not a question that has any objective scientific answer. 17. Nevertheless, Naturalists will inevitably run it through their various moral theories. The ultimate reality is physical, material reality. On the Postmodernist view, what is real and what is true are ultimately defined by us. If there is such a thing as goodness, it must be defined in wholly naturalistic terms. This site uses cookies to recognize users and allow us to analyse site usage. Embryonic research. But given that the Buddha made quite scathing remarks about the foolishness of speculation not based on experience, how can we talk about the nature of liberation? However, this leads to the question of what a human is. Fusce dui lectus, congue vel laoreet ac, dictum vitae odio. Nam risus ante, dapibus a molestie consequat, ultrices ac magna. Genetic enhancement. Moreover, these four questions are logically connected in much the same way that theyre connected for antique items brought to the roadshow. Some Naturalists find a strict scientism too narrow, but they will still affirm empiricism: one can only know what is perceived through the senses. According to Christianityand Christianity alonethe infinite God has united himself with a fully human nature, both body and soul! Needless to say, the existence of God is the most foundational presupposition of the biblical worldview. ", "Is there then any attribute of nibbana found in other things that can be demonstrated by a simile?". The Buddha was a holy man and teacher who achieved enlightenment. These arguments provide some support for the doctrine of no-self. Rhodes Professor of Humane Letters Emeritus, is an atheist. Legal. Nam lacinia pulvinar tortor nec facilisis. It is important to qualify that what is extinguished is suffering (ultimately caused by ignorance): the self is not extinguished, for there never was a self, only the illusion of one. St. Athanasius famously declared of Christ, He became man that we might become God.[21] Needless to say, there are orthodox and unorthodox ways to understand that statement! Is Nagasena's argument a plausible one? Anicca is impermanence. For Nagasena, he is not part of his body, he is not all his parts together, nor the form of his body, nor feelings, perceptions, impulses or consciousness, nor a (and not a) combination of these things - Milinda draws on five skandhas (form, sensations, perceptions, impulses and consciousness). Nothing is objectively good or bad (i.e., independently of us). Some readers might be asking at this point, What is distinctively Christian about any of this? [1] Nam risus ante, dapibus a molestie consequat, ultrices ac magna. Other personalities mentioned in the text are Ngasena's father Souttara, his teachers Rohana, Assagutta of Vattaniya and another teacher named yupla from Sankheyya near Sgala. We should make every effort to protect and preserve human life, and to promote (as the current lingo has it) human flourishing. Explain Nagasena's view in what human nature is. Naturalists can be (and have been) quite open about this. Naturally enough, this raises the question of what counts as naturalan issue that turns out to be vigorously debated even among professing Naturalists. A worldviewor world-and-life view as some prefer to saywill include views on all four areas. All rights reserved. However, our initial protest against the doctrine remains. Topic 7 Discussion Questions for both 1 and 2. Buddhists argue that it is only conventionally, not ultimately, true that we are persons: that is, our conception of ourselves as persons does not correspond with reality. Donec aliquet. Perhaps we may have glimpses in our lifetime of what Nirvana is like, but whenever we attempt to capture what it is, we immediately loose sight of it: Nirvana is by nature indescribable, and therefore we cannot make the final pronouncement on whether no-self is compatible with it. The worldviews of Naturalism and Postmodernism hold considerable sway in our culture today, but they can offer no meaningful basis for human dignity, human rights, human equality, and human solidarity. Not all milk turns to curd, then butter, and then ghee, and whilst the milk is still milk surely it still has the identity of milk? Neither King Menander nor Nagasena established the "essential nature" of "permanent identity." . As there is no place where fire is stored up, yet it may be produced by rubbing two dry sticks together. Simple: we are whatever we define ourselves to be. "Like a wish-fulfilling gem, it fulfills all desires, causes delight and is lustrous. Milk is not identical with curds or butter or ghee, but curds, butter and ghee are produced because of milk. ", "Do not, Nagasena, answer this question by making it obscure! The doctrine is certainly asserted by Buddhism, and was strongly implied by sermons of the Buddha himself (see verse 7 of the Dhammapada, or the Alagaddupama-Sutta of the Majjhima Nikaya). a mytha throwback to a modernist pipe-dream; a concealed attempt to exert power over some individual or group; a matter of internal coherence within ones own interpretation of the world. Fusce, icitur laoreet. If we define Nirvana in negative terms, as annihilation, extinction or nothingness, then since true nothingness plausibly implies that nobody experiences it, the Buddhists could plausibly assert the compatibility of no-self with this concept of liberation. The introduction sets the scene for the dialogue and establishes Milinda as a king with an enquiring mind and Nagasena as a sage and scholar with supernatural powers - their views deserve to be listened to. This puts Naturalists in something of a predicament, because it is widely recognized that science cannot deliver value judgments. Buddhists deny that a person can remain numerically identical with him or herself over time on that grounds that time itself necessarily implies numerical change. When Buddhists claim that Nirvana is blissful, they could be describing it as a positive state of pleasure or happiness, but this interpretation is unwarranted given their commitment to the view that human experience invariably brings with it existential angst and suffering. (To put the point rather pointedly: God did not take on a canine nature and make an atonement for dogs!). Alternatively, we could characterize Nirvana in positive terms, describing it as a blissful state although once again, this would seem to necessitate a self for whom it is blissful. Western philosophy assumes that there are particular, fixed things, separate from other things, Nagasena denies this about the self. To each of these Milinda too replies negatively. Why three? So our first priority as Christians must be what it has always been: to proclaim the gospel and pray for revival. Rather, this definition of Nirvana forces the conclusion that Buddhism is essentially nihilistic which Buddhists would deny. It is composed as a dialogue between King Milinda, a Greek king (Menander) who ruled the northeast of India (Bactria) in the latter part of the second century B.C.E., and a learned monk . The paradox of liberation, meanwhile, trots on! Donec aliquet. Why is it that the chariot cannot be referred to as the parts collectively? One who stops the treadmill is" said to have realized nibbana. The truth of this principle is established by observation, in keeping with Buddhist empiricism. Rather, if something is good, that is because we have decided that it is good. One is tempted to think that Satan might have had a point here. Alternatively, we could interpret the nothingness of Nirvana to mean an undifferentiated continuum. Third, we should note that we are gendered creatures. In a dialogue with his disciple Vaccha, Buddha says of the Enlightened One: to say that he is reborn would not fit the case to say that he is not reborn would not fit the case to say that he is both reborn and not reborn would not fit the case to say that he is neither reborn nor not reborn would not fit the case (A Sourcebook in Indian Philosophy, p.290). Just this: the four questions mentioned above can also be applied to usto human beings. A person who is reborn is neither the same nor different. Week 2 DQ2021 school year. EXPLAIN NAGASENA VIEW ON HUMAN NATURE? The world is what it is, and has the meaning and value that it does, because of usbecause of our thoughts, our words, our activities. Bertrand Russell on Religion, with Buddhist Commentaries. (Genesis 1:26-27). This means that I could never find myself dissatisfied with and wanting to change myself, which in turn means that any part of me that I can find myself wanting to change could not be myself (Buddhism as Philosophy, p.47). Pellentesque dapibus efficitur laoreet. To attain liberation from the cycle of re-birth and the accumulation of karma, among other things, one must relinquish the belief in an enduring self retaining identity over time and performing the executive function of controller. As for a Christian view of knowledge, surely the first point to affirm is that God is the ultimate knower. But to underscore once again the indispensability of a sound anthropology, consider this selection of recent news headlines: Woman Has Abortion Because She Couldnt Fit Into Her Wedding Dress Pellentesque dapibus efficitur laoreet. Milk turns to curds, then butter, then ghee. Break this dart of uncertainty.". Fusce dui lectus, congue vel laoreet ac, dictum vitae odio. We are the creators of the worldindeed, the creators of ourselves! Unlike Christianity, Islam offers no doctrine of the imago Dei. The topic of this lecture is anthropology: the study of mankind. Rebirth is not the soul or a fixed thing, but the continuation of a process where karmic formations cause future effects. In other words, Christian Theism affirms a revelational epistemology. Christian Theism offers a very distinctive and significant story of origins. Nagasena then scrutinises Milindas claim that he arrived by chariot in the same terms, asking whether chariot refers to the axle, pole, seat etc., or whether chariot refers simply to the unity of these parts. One thinks here of Van Tils vivid analogy of a man made of water trying to raise himself out of an infinite expanse of water by building a ladder of water. What it means to be human, for Wittgenstein, is our ability to think consciously. Perhaps the most memorable summary of the Naturalist worldview can be credited to Carl Sagan: The cosmos is all that was, or is, or ever will be. While the number of card-carrying Naturalists may be relatively small, the basic worldview of Naturalism exerts a disproportionately strong influence on academic and culture today. [17], Consider first the Islamic worldview. Worldviews cannot be imposed from the outside. Its view of truth and knowledge. Right understanding, right thought, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness and right concentration. May, 2017 | in it. Truth doesnt exist in the abstract, independently of God. "As the ocean is empty of corpses,3 nibbana is empty of all defilements; as the ocean is not increased by all the rivers that flow into it, so nibbana is not increased by all the beings who attain it; it is the abode of great beings [those who have attained enlightenment], and it is decorated with the waves of knowledge and freedom. Indeed, what we find in the New Testament is that the original theme of the image of God in man is transposed into a new key. Meanwhile, the fellow who brought what he believed to be a rare Ming Dynasty vase, which he was planning on selling in order to fund a very comfortable retirement, is excruciatingly deflated when the expert points out three tiny but significant words etched under its rim: Made in Taiwan. In characterizing what a self would be if it were instantiated, Buddhists have claimed three main properties: permanence, control and numerical identity. Here I will mention only two theories of moral goodness popular among Naturalists: With this bare-bones outline of the Naturalist worldview in place, let us turn our attention to anthropology. We cannot understand the value of human beings without knowing something about our nature and our origins. He rightly grasps the cyclic nature of formations and therein he sees only birth, old age, disease and death; he sees nothing pleasant or agreeable in any part of it. In summary: we are creatures, made in Gods image, gendered, social, both physical and spiritual, and corrupted by sin in every part. The story is about a monk called Nagasena, who visited a king called Milinda. Our fundamental anthropologyour view of human nature and human originswill inevitably have huge implications for how we view other people, how we value them, how we relate to them, and how we treat them, both individually and as a society. In reality, these divisions and debates will never be resolved without real gospel transformation. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth. So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them. Before his enlightenment, he was a noble person called Siddhartha . You have set your glory above the heavens When I look at your heavens, the work of your fingers, the moon and the stars, which you have set in place, what is man that you are mindful of him, and the son of man that you care for him? There is no agreed-upon point at which Nagasena's authorship may be said to end (and the work of other hands begins), nor has this been perceived as an inherently important distinction by monastic scholars. Naturalism, by definition, rejects the idea of any transcendent supernatural cause, from which it follows that the universe is either eternal or came into existence spontaneously without any prior cause (both positions are defended by Naturalists today). (As Marvin Minsky, the MIT professor and pioneer of artificial intelligence put it, humans are essentially meat machines.) Postmodernism, on the other hand, ascribes to us virtually God-like power and authority. We can also talk about a worldview as a generalized type, as I will be doing here. it is not-born. Nam lacinia pulvinar tortor nec facilisis. Book: Six Ways of Being Religious (Cannon), { "10.01:_Nagasena_Replies_to_the_Questions_of_King_Milinda" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "10.02:_Anselm\'s_Faith_Seeking_Understanding" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "10.03:_Chapter_Summary" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "10.04:_Study_Questions_on_Similarities_and_Differences" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "10.05:_For_Further_Reading" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "10.06:_Notes" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()" }, { "00:_Front_Matter" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "01:_General_Introduction" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "02:_Thinking_Generically_about_Religion" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "03:_Different_Ways_of_Being_Religious" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "04:_The_Ways_of_Being_Religious_Exemplified" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "05:_Variations_in_Quality_of_Practice_of_the_Ways" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "06:_Using_the_Framework" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "07:_Applysing_the_Framework_to_the_Whole_of_Buddhism" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "08:_Applying_the_Framework_to_the_Whole_of_Christianity" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "09:_The_Way_of_Mystical_Quest" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "10:_The_Way_of_Reasoned_Inquiry" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "11:_The_Way_of_Right_Action" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "12:_The_Way_of_Devotion" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "13:_The_Way_of_Shamanic_Mediation" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "14:_The_Way_of_Sacred_Rite" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "15:_Comparing_Buddhism_and_Christianity_by__Means_of_the_Framework" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "zz:_Back_Matter" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()" }, 10.1: Nagasena Replies to the Questions of King Milinda, [ "article:topic", "license:ccbync", "authorname:dalecannon", "licenseversion:40", "source@https://digitalcommons.wou.edu/facbooks/1" ], https://human.libretexts.org/@app/auth/3/login?returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fhuman.libretexts.org%2FBookshelves%2FReligious_Studies%2FBook%253A_Six_Ways_of_Being_Religious_(Cannon)%2F10%253A_The_Way_of_Reasoned_Inquiry%2F10.01%253A_Nagasena_Replies_to_the_Questions_of_King_Milinda, \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}}}\) \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{#1}}} \)\(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)\(\newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\), 10.2: Anselm's Faith Seeking Understanding, source@https://digitalcommons.wou.edu/facbooks/1, status page at https://status.libretexts.org.